APPLICATION OF THE FMEA METHOD IN DETERMINING IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES IN THE PRODUCT QUALITY SYSTEM AT COMPANY X

  • Antonius Cahyono
  • Manik Ayu Titisari Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • Rusdiyantoro Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
Keywords: Prioritization of Improvement, Quality System, Company Products

Abstract

Company X is a manufacturing company integrated with production segments ranging from spinning, weaving, dyeing, and finishing. The company has contributed to advancing the Indonesian textile industry as an important element in the domestic production sector. However, during the production process defects often occur or the results of goods that are not in accordance with company standards often occur. The purpose of this research is to identify the causes of defects, as well as to form priority recommendations for improvement with the aim of maintaining product quality according to company standards. Data analysis applied in this study uses the Failure Modes Effect Analysis (FMEA) method. The results of this study indicate that there are 7 types of defects with the highest frequency, namely colour spots/chemical defects which are the priority for improvement in the quality system. There are 9 failure modes with the highest RPN, namely 360 in the imperfect Drug Dissolution Failure Mode. There are 5 factors that cause defects and suggestions for improvements to each problem in these factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American National Standards Institute. (1996). Safety Standard for Air Compressor Systems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers.

Cameron, I., Mannan, S., Németh, E., Park, S., Pasman, H., Rogers, W., & Seligmann, B. (2017). Process hazard analysis, hazard identification and scenario definition: Are the conventional tools sufficient, or should and can we do much better? Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 110, 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.01.025

Chin, K. S., Wang, Y. M.,Ka Kwai Poon, G., & Yang, J. B. (2009). Failure mode and effects analysis using a group-based evidential reasoning approach. Computers and Operations Research, 36(6), 1768–1779.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2008.05.002

Crosby, Philips B. (1979), Quality is Free: The art of Making Quality Certain, New American Library, New York.

Deming, W.E. (1982). Out Of The Crisis-Quality, Productivity And Competitive Position. Cambrige University Press.

Deming, W. Edwards. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Feigenbaum, A. V. (1992). Kendali mutu Terpadu. Alih bahasa: Kandahjaya, H. Jakarta: Erlangga

Feigenbaum, A.V. (1991). Total Quality Control. New York : Mc-Graw Hill Book Company

Liu, H.-C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failuremode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert sistems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010.

Lupiyadi, Rambat. (2006), Manajemen Pemasaran Jasa, Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Sharma, K. D., & Srivastava, S. (2018). Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) implementation: a literature review.J Adv Res Aeronaut Space Sci, 5, 1–17.

Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution.Quality Press.

Sugiarto, Endar. (2003). Psikologi Pelayanan dalam Industri Jasa. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Published
2023-04-15
How to Cite
Cahyono, A., Titisari, M. A., & Rusdiyantoro. (2023). APPLICATION OF THE FMEA METHOD IN DETERMINING IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES IN THE PRODUCT QUALITY SYSTEM AT COMPANY X. Jurnal Scientia, 12(02), 1218-1224. https://doi.org/10.58471/scientia.v12i02.1329

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'where clause'