Accountability of Building Permit Services in Buton Regency

  • Rahmawati Rahmawati Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
  • La didi Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
  • Asrul Asrul Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Negara, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Dayanu Ikhsanuddin
Keywords: Accountability, Building Approval Services (PBG)

Abstract

This study aims to explore the accountability of building approval services at the Investment and One-Stop Integrated Service Office (DPMPTSP) of Buton Regency; procedures in building approval services, cost certainty, time standards and responsiveness. Data collection techniques are carried out through interview methods, observation, documentation, and online data search methods, data analysis techniques are carried out through data reduction, and drawing conclusions. The findings of this study indicate that the Accountability of Building Construction Permit Services in Buton Regency, as a whole, is not fully accountable, there are still several dimensions that are considered inadequate as follows: “1. The service procedure is not in accordance with the SOP contained in the standard service standards, the public still does not know much about the change in regulations from IMB to PBG, socialization has not been carried out so that the public is confused about taking care of building permits, 2. Transparent financing according to community expectations, financing is regulated in regional regulation number 6 of 2023 concerning Regional Taxes and Regional Retributions although there are still several points that are different from the previous IMB retribution, such as technical standard compliance inspection services, PBG issuance, and building inspections but are still carried out manually. 3. The time period for processing PBG regulations at the Buton Regency PUPR DPUPR is not in accordance with the applicable provisions and SOPs. During the transition period, the IMB regulation is still the patron in serving PBG permits which has an impact on the process of adapting online-based PBG licensing services, in terms of the division of the implementation of PBG licensing services involving two (2) agencies which has implications for the service process which takes a long time and is not on time”. 4. The responsiveness of the PUPR Service of Buton Regency is quite good, the PUPR service and related officers quickly respond to complaints and complaints from the public so that the public can understand the mechanism of PBG licensing regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdulla, Faisal. 2009. Jalan Terjal Good Governance: Prinsip, Konsep & Tantangan Dalam Negara Hukum. Pukab: Makassar.

Afriani, Karin dan Fathul Wahid. 2009. Dampak E- Goverment pada Good Governance: Temuan Empiris dari Kota Jambi.Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta.

Akhmad dan Haedar Akib. 2014. Implementasi Kebijakan Pelayanan Izin Mandirikan Bangunan (Studi pada Kantor Pelayanan Terpadu Kabupaten Gowa). Ad’ministrare, Vol. 1, No. 1.

Ahmad, Badu. 2018.Pelayanan Publik Teori dan Praktik. Manggu Makmur Tanjung Lestari:

Bandung. Alamsyah, Dedi. 2012. Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan. Nuha Medika: Yogyakarta. Azwar, Azrul. 2011. Pengantar Administrasi Kesehatan. Bina Rupa Aksara: Tangeran.

Chandler, Ralph C and Plano Jack C. 1992. The Public Administratio Dictionary Singapare: John Wilwy & Sons.

Dwiyanto, Agus. 2014. Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.

Dwiyanto, dkk. (2002). “Reformasi Birokrasi publik di Indonesia” Pusat Studi kependudukan dan kebijakan UGM: Yogyakarta.

Duadji, Noverman, 2013, Menejemen Pelayanan Publik (Wacana Konsep, Teori dan Problema Pelayanan), Bandar Lampung : Universitas Lampung.

Ellwood, Sheila. (2008). Parish and Town financial AccountabilityManagement, Local Government Studies.

Geonawan. 2009. Panduan Mengurus Sertifikat Tanah dan Propesi. Yogyakarta: Galang Press.

Hardiansyah. 2011. Kualitas Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta:Gava Media Juliantara. 2005. Peningkatan Kapasitas Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta : Pembaruan

Hayat. 2017. Manajemen Pelayanan Publik.Rajawali Pers: Jakarta

Keputusan Mentri PAN Nomor.26/KEP/M/.PAN/6/2004 tentang Pedoman Umum Penyelenggaraan Publik.

Kumorotomo, Wahyu. 2005. Akuntabilitas Birokrasi publik: Sketsa pada masa transisi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Kohler, 1995, Reporting on the entity’s control structure, Managerial financial accountability, performance accountability

Laksmi, Fuad dan Budiantoro. 2008. Manajemen Perkantoran Modern. Pernaka: Jakarta.

Lukman, Sampara. 2004. Manajemen Kualitas Pelayanan. STIA-LAN Press: Jakarta.

Peraturan Daerah Kota Parepare Nomor 10 Tahun 2011-2031 tentang Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Parepare.

Pasolong, Harbani. 2012. Metode Penelitian Administrasi Publik. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Prasojo, Eko. 2006. Kinerja Pelayanan Publik Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Kinerja, Keterlibatan dan Partisipasi dalam Pelayanan Pendidikan, Kesehatan dan Kependudukan. Yappika: Jakarta.

Raba, Manggaukang. 2006. Akuntabilitas Konsep dan Implementasi. Malang UUM Press.

Ratminto, Winarsih Septi Atik. 2005. Manajemen Pelayanan Pengembangan Model Konseptual Penerapan Citizen’s dan Standar Pelayanan Menimal.. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Published
2025-01-23
How to Cite
Rahmawati, R., La didi, & Asrul, A. (2025). Accountability of Building Permit Services in Buton Regency. INFOKUM, 13(02), 312-327. https://doi.org/10.58471/infokum.v13i02.2775