Analysis of the Implementation of Bureaucratic Reform Policy in the Ministry of Home Affairs
Abstract
Bureaucratic reform that has been implemented by the government for more than 10 years as an effort to reform and change various aspects of government administration is not getting closer to the expected goals. This can at least be seen from the value of the Community Satisfaction Survey (SKM) and the Corruption Perception Index which continues to decline. The Ministry of Home Affairs in implementing bureaucratic reform has a significant role because it is included in the National Bureaucratic Reform Team. However, the gap in this research stems from the value of the Bureaucratic Reform Index in the Ministry of Home Affairs from 2015 to 2022 which tends to be stagnant and continues to show a wide gap between the results of the RB index and the targets set in the Ministry of Home Affairs' Strategic Plan. This research uses the Policy Implementation theory according to George Edward III as a basis for analysis. Researchers focus on the dimensions of communication, resources, disposition and organizational structure of policy. Next, describe the supporting and inhibiting factors in policy implementation and produce efforts to overcome existing obstacles. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative, with the researcher as the research instrument, data collection techniques using interviews, documentation and observation, snowball sampling techniques for selecting informants, data analysis through reduction, presentation and drawing conclusions supported by triangulation of sources for data validity. The research results show that the implementation of reforms in the Ministry of Home Affairs in 2023 has shown quite optimal results. This is shown by the RB Index value which was able to increase significantly by 5.02 points or 84.19 (satisfactory with the record). However, the results obtained were still below the strategic plan target, namely 91.01 (satisfactory). The inhibiting factors can be seen in the lack of influence of the simplification of the organizational structure on work culture and the implementation of the fragmentation of responsibilities related to digitalization which actually leads to overlapping applications. In addition, the risk of corruption is still in the "vulnerable" category. To overcome these obstacles, this is done by implementing a new work system evenly in each work unit, developing corruption prevention through integrity zones and using big data as a data integration effort.
Downloads
References
Abidin, S.Z.,. 2006. Kebijakan Publik Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Suara Bebas
Agustino, L. 2017. Dasar-Dasar Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
Ali, Faried dkk. 2012. Studi Analisa Kebijakan: Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasi Sampel Teknik Analisa Kebijakan pemerintah. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditamma.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Basrowi dan Suwandi, 2008. Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif Cet, 1. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Blau, Peter M. & Meyer. Birokrasi Dalam Masyarakat Modern. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta, 2000
Budiarjo, M. 2008. Dasar Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Creswell, J. W. 2015. Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Islamy, M. I. 2009. Prinsip-Prinsip Perumusan Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Kusumanegara, Solahuddin. 2010. Model dan Aktor dalam Proses Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gava Media
Labolo, M. 2017. Memahami Ilmu Pemerintahan: Suatu Kajian, Teori, Konsep, dan Pengembangannya. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Marbun, S. dan M. Mahfud. 2011. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Moleong, L. J. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nawawi, Ismail. 2009. Public Policy. Surabaya: Putra Media Nusantara.
Ndraha, T. 2015. Kybernology : Ilmu Pemerintahan Baru. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Neuman, W. L. 2014. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Nugroho, Rian. 2014. Public Policy. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Nugroho, Riant, D, 2005. Kebijakan Publik : Formulasi, Implementasi, dan Evaluasi. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Nurdin, I. & Hartati, S., 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Surabaya: Media Sahabat Cendekia
Wahab, Solichin Abdul, 2004. Implementasi Kebijakan Negara.Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Widjaja. HAW. 2011. Otonomi Daerah dan Daerah Otonom. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Widodo, Joko. 2010. Analisis Kebijakan Publik: Konsep dan aplikasi analisis proses kebijakanpublik, Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Winarno, Budi. 2005.Teori dan Proses Kebijakan Publik. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
Perpres No. 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010-2025;
Keputusan Presiden RI No. 8 Tahun 2020 tentang Komite Pengarah Reformasi Birokrasi Nasional dan Tim Reformasi Birokrasi Nasional Periode Tahun 2020-2024;
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 67 Tahun 2020 tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Dalam Negeri Tahun 2020-2024;
Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor: 000.9.6-1341 Tahun 2023 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi Kementerian Dalam Negeri Tahun 2020-2024;
Keputusan Menteri Dalam Nomor: 821.29 – 5894 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Atas Kepmendagri Nomor: 821.29-4763 Tahun 2020 tentang Pemberhentian Dari Jabatan Administrasi Serta Pengangkatan Ke Dalam Jabatan Fungsional Melalui Mekanisme Penyetaraan;
Permenpan-RB Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 tentang Perubahan atas Permenpan-RB Nomor 25 Tahun 2020 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi 2020-2024;
Keputusan Menteri Dalam Nomor 821.29 – 5894 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Atas Kepmendagri Nomor: 821.29-4763 Tahun 2020 tentang Pemberhentian Dari Jabatan Administrasi Serta Pengangkatan Ke Dalam Jabatan Fungsional Melalui Mekanisme Penyetaraan.
Abdulla, Sait. (2023). Problematika Dan Tantangan Kebijakan Penyederhanaan Birokrasi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Volume 14, Nomor 1, Januari 2023
Gedeon, Hendrikus Triwibawanto. (2010). Reformasi Birokrasi Pemerintahan Menuju Good Governance Dalam Perspektif Administrasi Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Volume VII No. 2 Juni 2010.
Ginting, Rosalina. (2015). Dampak Reformasi Birokrasi Terhadap Kinerja Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah CIVIS, Volume V, No 1, Januari 2015