ABILITY TO WRITE SENTENCES USING ACRONYMS ON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Feb 28, 2020
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Vol. 8 No. 2, Feb (2020): Education, Sosial science and Planning technique

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Etia Sunarsih
Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program, STKIP Singkawang
Nadir Nur Hajijah
Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program, STKIP Singkawang

Abstract

A descriptive study of the ability to write using acronyms is an effort to improve and develop it as a written work using relevant and accountable scientific references. In this study, what was examined was the ability of students in writing sentences using acronyms based on a contextual approach. Frequency calculations are used by calculating the Mean, Mode, and Median and then converting the score into the final value. From the results of this study, it was obtained that the highest score of students in writing sentences using acronyms was 95 classified as excellent criteria, the lowest score in writing sentences using the acronym 75 was classified as right criteria, and the average score of students in writing sentences using acronyms was 89, 06 is classified as an excellent criterion. Then we get a median of 90 and a mode of 90.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Sunarsih, E., & Nur Hajijah, N. (2020). ABILITY TO WRITE SENTENCES USING ACRONYMS ON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS. Jurnal Scientia, 8(2, Feb), 33-36. Retrieved from https://infor.seaninstitute.org/index.php/pendidikan/article/view/53

References

[1] N. W. Sartini, “Bahasa Pergaulan Remaja: Analisis Fonologi Generatif,” MOZAIK J. Ilmu Hum., 2012.
[2] N. Astuti, “Singkatan dan Akronim di Kalangan Remaja Kota Bandung,” Bahtera Sastra Antol. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., 2014.
[3] N. Herawati, “Akronim Bahasa Jawa di Wilayah Solo,” Magistra, 2016.
[4] E. Gazali, “Akronim Majemuk dalam teks Arab Modern,” Int. Conf. Appl. Linguist. 5 Lang. Teach. Dev. Glob. World, 2012.
[5] Zamri Mahamod & Nor Razah Lim, “Kepelbagaian kaedah penyoalan lisan dalam pengajaran guru bahasa melayu: kaedah pemerhatian,” 2011.
[6] T. Wiratno and R. Santosa, “Bahasa, Fungsi Bahasa, dan Konteks Sosial,” Modul Pengantar Linguist. Umum, 2014.
[7] G. Yusri, N. M. Rahimi, and P. M. Shah, “Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Pembelajaran Kemahiran Lisan Bahasa Arab Di Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM),” GEMA Online J. Lang. Stud., 2010.
[8] A. Yusoff, “Masalah Pembelajaran : Tanda Dan Simptom,” J. Bhs., 2014.
[9] P. I. G. N. Ketut, “Ragam Bahasa Indonesia,” Ragam Bhs. Indones., 2018.
[10] S. A. H. Ikhsan and S. Ahmad, “Kontrak Sosial Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Lisan: Tinjauan Terhadap Perspektif Pelajar,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., 2014.
[11] N. Susmita, “Alih Kode dan Campur Kode dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Smp Negeri 12 Kerinci,” J. Penelit. Jambi Seri Hum., 2015.
[12] A. Giorgi, “The descriptive phenomenological psychological method,” Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 2016.
[13] R. T. Hurlburt and S. A. Akhter, “The descriptive experience sampling method,” Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci., 2006.