COMPARISON OF THE MAMDANI AND SUGENO METHOD TO INCREASE THE LEVEL OFANALYSIS THE ADVANTAGES OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT
Keywords:
Increase The Level Of Analysis The Advantages, Infrastructure Development, Mamdani Method, Sugeno Method
Abstract
To increase the accuracy of the output value of a Mamdani-based decision support system compared to the manual analysis system. The value of the analysis carried out using the system should have a value close to the value that is done manually. For this reason, this study will compare Mamdani and Sugeno methods to observe the similarity of values with manual calculation data. In processing fuzzy input data produces output from the inference process which is then classified in 5 feasibility conditions, namely, low, normal, high, very high and not feasible which is used as a supporting facility in making infrastructure development decisions in an area
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
[1] Sri Hartati, Imas S Sitanggang,” A Fuzzy Based Decision Support System for Evaluating Land Suitability and Selecting Crops “ Journal of computer science 6(4):417-424, 2010.
[2] Panduan Pelaksana PNPM PISEW TAHUN 2010
[3] “ Kecerdasan buatan”, http://idhaclassroom.com/2007/09/15/../kecerdasan buatan.html. Tanggal akses 10 juli 2010.
[4] Suparman, “ Komputer Masa Depan Pengenalan Artificial Intelligence”, Marlan. ,Andi, Yogyakarta, 2007.
[5] Kusumadewi, S., Analisis Desain Sistem Fuzzy Menggunakan Tool Box Matlab, Penerbit Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2002.
[6] Kusumadewi, S., dan Purnomo, H., “Aplikasi Logika Fuzzy untuk Pendukung Keputusan”, Penerbit Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2004
[7] IGunaidi Abdia Away, “ MATLAB Programming”, Informatika, Bandung, 2010
[8] Kusumadewi, S., Analisis Desain Sistem Fuzzy Menggunakan Tool Box Matlab, Penerbit Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2002.
[9] Efraim Turban, Jay E. Aronson, Ting Peng Liang,” Dicision Support System and Intelligent Systems (Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dan Sistem Cerdas)”, ANDI, Yogyakarta 2005
[10]Dr. Eng. Agus Naba “ Belajar Cepat Fuzzy Logic menggunakan MATLAB” ANDI, Yogyakarta 2009
[2] Panduan Pelaksana PNPM PISEW TAHUN 2010
[3] “ Kecerdasan buatan”, http://idhaclassroom.com/2007/09/15/../kecerdasan buatan.html. Tanggal akses 10 juli 2010.
[4] Suparman, “ Komputer Masa Depan Pengenalan Artificial Intelligence”, Marlan. ,Andi, Yogyakarta, 2007.
[5] Kusumadewi, S., Analisis Desain Sistem Fuzzy Menggunakan Tool Box Matlab, Penerbit Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2002.
[6] Kusumadewi, S., dan Purnomo, H., “Aplikasi Logika Fuzzy untuk Pendukung Keputusan”, Penerbit Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2004
[7] IGunaidi Abdia Away, “ MATLAB Programming”, Informatika, Bandung, 2010
[8] Kusumadewi, S., Analisis Desain Sistem Fuzzy Menggunakan Tool Box Matlab, Penerbit Graha Ilmu, Yogyakarta, 2002.
[9] Efraim Turban, Jay E. Aronson, Ting Peng Liang,” Dicision Support System and Intelligent Systems (Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dan Sistem Cerdas)”, ANDI, Yogyakarta 2005
[10]Dr. Eng. Agus Naba “ Belajar Cepat Fuzzy Logic menggunakan MATLAB” ANDI, Yogyakarta 2009
Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
Barus, E. S. (2021). COMPARISON OF THE MAMDANI AND SUGENO METHOD TO INCREASE THE LEVEL OFANALYSIS THE ADVANTAGES OF INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT. INFOKUM, 9(2, June), 419-425. Retrieved from https://infor.seaninstitute.org/index.php/infokum/article/view/155
Section
Articles
