LEGAL CERTAINTY ON THE STATUS OF THE INTERNAL COURT EXECUTION OBJECT GUARANTEE FIDUCIARY
Abstract
Hope for justice seekers regarding the provisions in the Fiduciary Law incised a bright spot when the Constitutional Court passed its 3 (three) decisions, i.e., Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, Decision Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021, And Decision Number 71/PUU-XIX/2021 decided on a judicial review case on norms relating to the execution of fiduciary guarantee objects. Issues raised in research that is How legal certainty regarding the position of the Court in the execution of fiduciary object guarantees in the Fiduciary Law. This research use type study law normative with approach legislation invitations, conceptual and cases which were then analyzed qualitatively. The study also concludes that the Constitutional Court passed the 3 (three) Decisions has provided guarantees of legal certainty for the court's position in this matter of execution of fiduciary guarantee objects in the Fiduciary Law. Assurance law on the position of the court is essential to be realized because the court as The judiciary is a legal structure that is one of them the 3 (three) elements of the legal system which largely determine the order and reform of the law to dream of. Legal certainty guarantees to achieve objective law in side justice And expediency. In the framework, implement recognition, respect, and protection of constitutional rights entrusted by the 1945 Constitution as law highest.
Downloads
References
[2] Irzan, Azas-Azas Hukum Perdata, Suara Penghantar, Bagian Kedua, Cetakan ke-III, Jakarta: Penerbit LPU UNAS, 2019.
[3] Maskur, Laode, Ma’ruf Hafidz, dan Salle, “Kekuatan Kekuatan Eksekutorial Jaminan Fidusia Pasca Lahirnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU- XVII/2019”, Journal of Lex Generalis, Vol. 2, No. 2, Februari 2021.
[4] Palguna, I Dewa Gede, “Pembaruan Hukum Nasional, Sebuah Telaah dan Catatan Awal”, Makalah pada Webinar Nasional bertajuk “Pembangunan Hukum Menyongsong Indonesia Emas 2045” yang diselenggarakan oleh Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dwijendra, Denpasar, 2 Juli 2020.
[5] Rufaida, Khifni Kafa dan Rian Sacipto, “Tinjauan Hukum terhadap Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia tanpa Titel Eksekutorial yang Sah”, Jurnal Refleksi Hukum, Vol. 4, No. 1, Oktober 2019.
[6] Subiyanto, Achmad Edi, “Mendesain Kewenangan Kekuasaan Kehakiman Setelah Perubahan UUD 1945”, Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol. 9, No. 4, Desember 2012.
[7] Yulia, Hukum Acara Perdata, Lhokseumawe: Unimal Press, 2018.
[8] Indonesia, Constitution Base Country Republic Indonesian Year 1945
[9] , Book Constitution Law Civil
[10] , Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 42 of 1999 concerning Guarantees Fiduciary
[11] , Regulation Government RI Number 21 Year 2015 about System Method Registration Guarantee Fiduciary And Cost Making Deed Guarantee Fiduciary.
[12] , Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights (Permenkumham) Number 25 Years 2021 about System Method Registration, Change, And Deletion Guarantee Fiduciary.
[13] Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019
[14] Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2/PUU-XIX/2021
[15] Decision Court Constitution RI Number 71/PUU-XIX/2021.
