Community Empowerment Strategy Through Local Wisdom By The Village Community Empowerment Service Using An Ecosystem Approach In The Era Of The Industrial Revolution In The Meepago Traditional Territory, Central Papua Province

Marinus Moy Yumai; Ismail Nurdin; Margaretha Rumbekwan

Marinus Moy Yumai Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jatinangor
Ismail Nurdin Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jatinangor
Margaretha Rumbekwan Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jatinangor

Keywords: Empowerment, Local Wisdom, Ecosystem, Meepago Customs

Abstract

The results of this research aim to raise the issue of the community empowerment strategy implemented by the Village Community Empowerment Service (DPMK) through the use of local wisdom in the Meepago traditional area in the context of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era. The research method used is a qualitative research method to formulate ideal conditions for community empowerment through local wisdom with an ecosystem approach in the Meepago traditional area, Central Papua province. The researcher used two theories, namely the JunghoRoh theory (2018) and strategy analysis using ASOCA, which stands for (Ability.Strength,Opportunities, Culture and Agility). According to Suradinata (2014:18), ASOCA analysis adds elements of culture (culture) and agility (intelligence) as important elements in finding problem-solving strategies, decision making, and can be developed to follow changes, developments and needs. Based on the data and analysis described previously, it can be concluded that this research found that empowerment strategies based on local wisdom not only strengthen the cultural identity of the Meepago community but are also able to encourage innovation and technological adaptation that is relevant to local needs. In addition, collaboration between government, society and the private sector through an ecosystem approach produces effective synergies in achieving sustainable development goals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ateh, M.Y., Berman, E., & Prasojo, E. (2020). Intergovernmental Strategies Advancing Performance Management Use. Public Performance & Management Review,1-32.
Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking Democratic Accountability. In Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Behn, R. D.(2003).Why Measure Performance? Different Purposes Require Different Measures.Public Administration Review,63(5),1-14.
Bovens, Mark. (1998). The Quest for Respon sibility: Accountability and Citizenship in Complex Organization. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W.(2014). Educational Research-Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research.
Denhardt, Jabet V & Robert B, Denhardt. (2007). The New Public Service (expanded edition) Serving, not Steering. New York: M.E Sharpe, Inc.
Herzig, Christian & Schltegger, Stefan. (2006). Coorporate Suistain ability Reporting (an Overview). In: Schaltegger S., Bennett M.,BurrittR. (eds) Sustainability Accounting and Reporting. Springer, Dordrecht.
Hooge, Liesbet & Marks, Gary. (2003). Unravering the Central State, But How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. Reihe Politic Wissen schaff Political Science Series.
Lee,Christoper D.(2005). Rethinking the Goals of Your Performance-Management System.
Meier, Kenneth J.,&Jr.,L.J.O.(2006). Bureaucracy in a Democratic State The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Merriam, S. B.(2016). Qualitative Research- A Guide to Design and lmplementation (p.1353). Jossey Bass.
Neo, B. S. dan Chen, G. (2007). Dynamic Governance: Embedding Culture, Capabilities and Change in Singapore. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Peraturan Presiden Nomor 29 Tahun 2014 tentang Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja lnstansi Pemerintah
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 8 Tahun 2009 Tentang Pelaporan Keuangan dan Kinerja Instansi pemerintahan Pemerintah.
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 12 Tahun 2015 tentang Pedoman Evaluasi atas Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah,
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 90 Tahun 2019 Tentang Klasifikasi, Kodefikasi,Dan Nomenklatur Perencanaan Pembangunan Dan Keuangan Daerah
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 18 Tahun 2020 Tentang Laporan Dan Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah
Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 17 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pedoman Penyusunan Rencana Kerja Pemerintah Daerah Tahun 2022
Peraturan Menteri Pendayaguanaan Aparatur dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 89Tahun 2021 Tentang Penjenjangan Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 88 tahun 2021 tentang Evaluasi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi
Peters, B. G. (2007). Public Accountability of Autonomous Public Organizations. In Linkages: Responsibilities and Accountabilities (Vol. 3,pp.297-336).
Peters, B.G & Jon Pierre. (2007). Handbook of Public Policy. London: SAGE Publications.
Peters, B.G.(2007). Performance - based accountability. In A.Shah (Ed.). Performance accountability and combating corruption (pp. 15-32). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Roh, J. (2018). Improving the govemment performance management system in South Korea Focusing on central Govenment agencies. Asian Education and Development Studies, 7(3),266-278.
Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatifdan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D、Bandung: Alfabeta.
Edi Suharto, 2014, Membangun Masyarakat Memberdayakan Rakyat (Kajian. Strategis Pembangunan Kesejahteraan Sosial & Pekerjaan Sosial),. PT.Refika Aditama.
Suradinata. (2014) Analisis Kepemimpinan ASOCA (Strategi Pengambilan Keputusan) Alqaprint-Jatinagor