Designing The Government Institution Performance Accountability System Implementation Using Soft Systems Methodology Approach, Study At The BMKG Indonesia

Achmad Supandi; Anni Arumsari Fitriany

doi:10.58471/scientia.v13i03.2582

Achmad Supandi BMKG Educaction and Training Center, Department of Public Administration, Brawijaya University, STIA BANTEN, Indonesia
Anni Arumsari Fitriany BMKG Education Training dan Indonesia University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58471/scientia.v13i03.2582

Keywords: government performance accountability, public policy, accountability reports, soft systems methodology

Abstract

His study aims to explore the factors that support or inhibit the implementation of the Government Institution Performance Accountability System (SAKIP) at the Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics of the Republic of Indonesia (BMKG). This study uses the Soft Systems Methodology to ensure a systematic and comprehensive approach to this study. The findings show that compliance with laws and regulations, mutual agreement in compiling Government Agency Performance Accountability Reports (LAKIP), and strong leadership commitment are key factors supporting the implementation of SAKIP at BMKG. conversely, the use of ineffective performance management applications and inadequate organizational capacity are factors inhibiting the implementation of SAKIP at BMKG.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Achmad Supandi. (2022). Analisis Kesenjangan Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah untuk Optimalisasi Manajemen Kinerja Layanan Informasi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika (Studi pada Badan Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika). In Disertasi.

Alexander, J. (1997). Avoiding the issue: Racism and administrative responsibility in public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 27(4), 343–361.

Bjerke, O. L. (2008). Soft Systems Methodology in action: A case study at a purchasing department. Rapport Nr.: Report/IT University of Göteborg 2008: 034.

Devi, E. T., Wibisono, D., Mulyono, N. B., & Fitriati, R. (2023a). Designing an information-sharing system to improve collaboration culture: a soft systems methodology approach in the digital service creation process. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.

Devi, E. T., Wibisono, D., Mulyono, N. B., & Fitriati, R. (2023b). Designing an information-sharing system to improve collaboration culture: a soft systems methodology approach in the digital service creation process. Journal of Enterprise Information Management.

Dunsire, A. (1978). The execution process. Vol. 1: Implementation in the bureaucracy. Vol 2: Control in a bureaucracy. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

Goh, S. C. (2012). Making performance measurement systems more effective in public sector organizations. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(1), 31–42.

Holzer, M., & Callahan, K. (1998). Government at work: Best practices and model programs. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

Ivanov, C.-I., & Avasilcăi, S. (2014). Performance measurement models: an analysis for measuring innovation processes performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 397–404.

Kemenpanrb. (2017). Report of the SAKIP Implementation in Ministraies/Institution of the Government of the Republic of Indonesia.

Kloot, L. (1999). Performance measurement and accountability in Victorian local government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 12(7), 565–584.

Koppell, J. G. S. (2005). Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder.” Public Administration Review, 65(1), 94–108.

Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi Sektor Publik (cetakan pertama). Andi Publisher.

Nasriani, & C. T. (2009). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) di Lingkungan Pemerintah Provinsi Riau. Jurnal Tepak Manajemen Bisnis, 1((3)), 107–131.

Nurani, A. S., Zauhar, S., & Saleh, C. (2015). Responsivitas pemerintah dalam penyelenggaraan pendidikan inklusif dalam perspektif new public service. Wacana Journal of Social and Humanity Studies, 18(4).

Oh, Y., & Bush, C. B. (2015). Assessing public sector performance and untangling the complexity of public performance measurement. International Review of Public Administration, 20(3), 256–272.

Proches, C. N. G., & Bodhanya, S. (2015). An application of soft systems methodology in the sugar industry. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 14(1), 1–15.

Putra, R. (2007). Penelitian Faktor- Faktor Penghambat Implementasi Sistem Akuntablitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (sakip). BPKP Perwakilan Kalimantan Timur. Http://Www.Bpkp.Go.Id/ Jateng/Konten/1910/Berburu-Opini-WTP.Bpkp.

Putro, U. S., Sunitiyoso, Y., & Fitriati, R. (2021). How do design parameters of firm governance affect collaboration process dimensions in professional service firm? Heliyon, 7(11), e08431.

Reynolds, M., & Holwell, S. (2020). Systems approaches to making change: A practical guide. Springer.

Riantiarno, R., & Azlina, N. (2011). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Studi pada Satuan Kerja Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Rokan Hulu). PEKBIS, 3(03).

Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press.

Soleman, R. (2007). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Penerapan Akuntabilitas Keuangan, dan Ketaatan pada Peraturan Perundangan Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (AKIP). Disertasi. Unpad.

Suryaatmaja, K., Wibisono, D., Ghazali, A., & Fitriati, R. (2020). Uncovering the failure of Agile framework implementation using SSM-based action research. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–18.

Tahir, H. K., Poputra, A. T., & Warongan, J. D. L. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerapan Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) pada Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Utara. ACCOUNTABILITY, 5(2), 37–51.

Triyoga. (2016). Ini Rapor Akuntabilitas Kinerja 77 Lembaga yang dinilai Kemenpan & RB. Https://News.Detik.Com/Berita/d-3110018/Inirapor-Akuntabilitas-Kinerja-77-Lembaga-Yang-Dinilai-Kemenpanrb.

Wahab Abdul, S. (2014). Analisis Kebijaksanaan: Dari Formulasi ke Implementasi Kebijaksanaan Negara. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Bumi Aksara.

Yusrianti, H., & Safitri, R. H. (2015). Implementasi Sistem Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (SAKIP) pada satuan kerja perangkat daerah (SKPD) di lingkungan pemerintah kota Palembang. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis Sriwijaya, 13(4), 545–558.