Driving Excellence: How Innovation Strategies and Organizational Commitment Shape Management Control Systems (MCS) with Organizational Culture as the Key Moderator
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the influence of innovation strategy and organizational commitment on the effectiveness of Management Control Systems (MCS) with organizational culture as a moderating variable in cyclical and non-cyclical companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) in 2023. Using a quantitative approach with a cross design -sectional, data was collected through questionnaires from 92 middle and upper level managers in cyclical and non-cyclical companies. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to test the hypothesis. The research results show that innovation strategy and organizational commitment have a significant positive effect on MCS effectiveness. Organizational culture is proven to moderate the relationship between innovation strategy and MCS effectiveness, as well as between organizational commitment and MCS effectiveness. The research model explained 58.7% of the variation in MCS effectiveness. These findings emphasize the importance of aligning innovation strategies, building organizational commitment, and creating a supportive culture to increase the effectiveness of MCS in cyclical and non-cyclical companies in Indonesia. This research provides a theoretical contribution to the development of MCS literature by integrating the perspectives of innovation strategy, organizational commitment, and organizational culture. Practically, the research results provide insight for managers of cyclical and non-cyclical companies in Indonesia in designing and implementing effective MCS, taking into account organizational contextual factors.
Downloads
References
Adwimurti, Y., Lumbantobing, S. P., Rahmani, H. F., & Tampubolon, R. B. (2024). Unlocking the potential of management control systems: the role of board effectiveness, strategic decision-making, and organizational context. Enrichment: Journal of Management, 14(4), 743-751.
Argyris, C. (1990). The dilemma of implementing controls: The case of managerial accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15(6), 503-511.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2020). Pertumbuhan Produksi IBS Triwulan III-2020. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2020/11/02/1738/pertumbuhan-produksi-ibs-triwulan-iii-2020-turun-4-31-persen.html
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Ekonomi Indonesia 2020 Turun sebesar 2,07 Persen (c-to-c). https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2021/02/05/1811/ekonomi-indonesia-2020-turun-sebesar-2-07-persen--c-to-c-.html
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Pertumbuhan Produksi IBS Triwulan III-2021. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2021/11/01/1800/pertumbuhan-produksi-ibs-triwulan-iii-2021-sebesar-3-68-persen.html
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Jumlah Perusahaan Industri Manufaktur Besar dan Sedang, 2021. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/9/443/1/jumlah-perusahaan-industri-manufaktur-besar-dan-sedang.html
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Ekonomi Indonesia 2021 Tumbuh 3,69 Persen. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2022/02/07/1800/ekonomi-indonesia-2021-tumbuh-3-69-persen.html
Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28, 12-30.
Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(8), 709-737.
Chenhall, R. H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(2-3), 127-168.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
Daft, R. L. (2012). Organization theory and design (11th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
Donaldson, L. (2001). The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Drazin, R., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1985). Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4), 514-539.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Flamholtz, E. G., Das, T. K., & Tsui, A. S. (1985). Toward an integrative framework of organizational control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 10(1), 35-50.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Haldma, T., & Lääts, K. (2002). Contingencies influencing the management accounting practices of Estonian manufacturing companies. Management Accounting Research, 13(4), 379-400.
Henri, J. F. (2006). Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31(6), 529-558.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 2307-0919.
Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Management control systems as a package—Opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19(4), 287-300.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
Merchant, K. A., & Van der Stede, W. A. (2017). Management control systems: Performance measurement, evaluation and incentives (4th ed.). Pearson Education.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2011). Innovation or imitation? The role of organizational culture. Management Decision, 49(1), 55-72.
Nouri, H., & Parker, R. J. (1998). The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(5-6), 467-483.
Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(4), 413-428.
Rahmani, H. F. (2024). Enhancing Digital Accounting Adoption: The Critical Role of Human Resource Competence and Infrastructure Availability.
Riketta, M. (2002). Attitudinal organizational commitment and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 257-266.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Tsui, J. S. (2001). The impact of culture on the relationship between budgetary participation, management accounting systems, and managerial performance: An analysis of Chinese and Western managers. The International Journal of Accounting, 36(2), 125-146.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1956). General System Theory. General Systems, 1, 1-10.
Widener, S. K. (2007). An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 757-788.